SWAPO Party’s 75% election victory - opposition claims “vote rigging”.
By Udo W. Froese, Johannesburg, South Africa and Windhoek, Namibia

Let’s check the real facts of
SWAPO Party’s 75% election
victory and the losers’ ‘sour
grapes response’.
Has the SADC Election
Monitoring Commission declared
Namibia’s recent elections
‘free, fair and peaceful’?
If so, than this would certainly
proof the trumped up
challenges of “vote rigging” a
deliberate and intentional hoax
to destabilise a peaceful nation
and the SADC region.
Do those challengers of the
election outcome and their allegations
of “vote rigging”
have any real concrete evidence
to the effect that “vote
rigging” had indeed and in fact
taken place? How, where exactly
with clear, factual evidence
only please.
African “vote rigging”:
It is known fact in sub-Saharan
Africa amongst most, if
not all heads-of-state and
members of the African Union
(AU), that accusations of “vote
rigging” have become common
practices to set up parallel
structures to existing governments
as a means to ‘install
democracy and all its sweet
worded network-of-pillars of
division, to divide and control
in order to motivate a so-called
balance of power, to undermine,
disinform, create fear
and insecurities, all done to finally
control in a Machiavellian
manner every single ruling
party, government and
country in the Third World.
It is important to take note
of the words of Cynthia
McKinney, former African-
American Congresswoman,
who is famous for her fight for
oppressed people in the world,
particularly in Africa, when she
said in an interview with the
magazine “New African” in
May 2009, responding to the
question: “The global financial
crisis is hitting Africa hard, but
Africa is not responsible for it.
What do you think President
Obama’s African policy is going
to be like?
And, here is Cynthia
McKinney’s answer: “It is not
going to be good, unfortunately.
If you look at President
Obama’s response to the situation
in Zimbabwe and his
comments about Sudan, it is
clear that Africom (the US
military bases in all of Africa’s
stragegic areas) will be established
on the continent, the
military presence of the United
States will be deepened, and
that does not bode well for the
African people. That is just
very simple.”
Let the examples speak for
themselves.
Kenya:
Kenya’s Rainbow Coalition,
which under President
Mwai Kibaki had grown out
of Jomo Kenyatta’s KANU,
was clearly undermined by the
brutal machinations of a paidup
lackey of the international
West, Raila Odinga, and his
right-hand man, William Ruto.
Ruto seems to be wellknown
as an alleged arms
trader and gun runner with further
serious allegations of being
part of the bloody uprising
in Kenya soon after the
elections. This allegedly ensured
Odinga and his weirdly
named “Orange Democratic
Movement (ODM)” his Prime
Ministership and a say in the
new “Government of National
Unity (GNU)”. Many
Kenyans paid the most dear
price for it - with their lives.
Kenyans bluntly accused
South African politicians,
Cyril Ramaphosa and that international,
neo-liberal Bishop
Desmond Tutu, to have channelled
funds for the “ODM”.
Those two politicians tried to
act as peace brokers at the time
of a “national uprising”. In
fact, when those two arrived
in Nairobi seperately from
each other, they were immediately
shown the way back to
Johanesburg. The motives of
Ramaphosa and Tutu were
openly questioned by Kenya’s
media.
Zambia:
A similar situation was imposed
on Zambia, when
former President Kenneth
Kaunda - who always seemd
to be pro-imperial-international
West, similar to his
former colleague, Kenya’s
Jomo Kenyatta - was ousted
by Frederick Chiluba and his
MMD.
The US Embassy allegedly
played a major role. Chiluba,
a trade unionist and his MMD
(similar to South Africa’s
COSATU leadership and
Zweli Vavi), was groomed and
guided by members of the US
Embassy in Lusaka, according
to local, senior observers. And,
senior local Zambian observers
told this columnist, the US
Embassy was open and clear
about that one then.
Now, why would that be?
As much as a moderate KK
tried to bend over backwards
to please the imperial-international
West during the era of
the Cold War, being a close
friend to Tiny Rowland and his
South Afican protege in
Lusaka, Marquard de Villiers,
regularly communicating with
South Africa’s John Vorster
and his securocrats, jailing
Robert Mugabe and supporting
Joshua Nkomo, Kaunda
was still rejected and forced out
of power by the international
West under the flag of democracy.
It was stragegised to ensure
that the assassinated, hugely
popular and heir-apparent to
former President Nelson
Mandela, the SACP head,
ANC senior leader and MK
Commander-in-Chief, Chris
Hani and Umkhonto we Sizwe
(MK) would not be able to return
to Zambia, if the
CODESA-negotiations in
Kempton Park in the East of
Johannesburg in 1990 to 1994
would not work out in favour
of the ANC.
If so, the ANC would have
to withdraw from said negotiations
and its MK would then
have to return to Zambia. However,
this was nipped in the bud.
A newly elected government
under the diminuitive Chiluba
and his opportunistic former
trade union, come political
party in Lusaka, with seriously
compromising accusations of
corruption and fraud, even allegations
of drug trafficking,
would have none of the aforementioned.
Zimbabwe:
Neighbouring Zimbabwe is
still going through the murderous
pains of accepting a SADC
negotiated Government of National
Unity (GNU). On the
one hand the besieged President
Robert Gabriel Mugabe
and the ruling ZANU-PF and
on the opposing side, Morgan
Tsvangirai and his Tendai Biti
(a person similar to Kenya’s
William Ruto), with equally
close ties with the US Embassy
in Harare have forged a united
government. The MDC came
from the Zimbabwean Congress
of Trade Unions (ZCTU).
Believe it or not, the ZCTU
is backed and has been
fociverously defended by SA’s
Congress of South African
Trade Unions (COSATU).
The author of this column is
surprised that Zimbabwe’s
MDC has not any form of ‘Orange’
in it.
South Africa:
The attempt to split the ANC
by forming the “Congress of
the People”, or COPE, described
as plagiarising the
ANC, is similar to the formation
of Namibia’s RDP/CoD.
International Western leaning
and Western educated fired senior
members of Namibia’s
ruling, popular party, SWAPO,
have tried the same, as COPE
attempted: splitting the resistance
movement, weakening it
and eventually getting rid of it
and its struggle history.
Madagascar:
Recently, Madagascar had a
military coup d’ etat, ousting
its president and enforcing an
unconstitutionally young Disc
Jockey into the Presidency.
There again the rather weird
word/fruit, “Orange”, was
used to define the “ruling, military”
under a said young DJ
government.
Remember, it was the US
American consultant, a certain
Dick Morris, who assisted the
engineering of the “Orange
Revolution” in the Ukraine?
In other words, it is a common,
imperial-international
Western formula.
A suggested way forward:
Therefore, every African
ruling party and government
would be well advised to
counter civil society, as done
by the former Prime Minister
of Singapor, Lee Kwanyuan,
outlined in his book “Singapor
Story” and Kenya’s former
Minister of State and Energy
and President Daniel Arap
Moi’s right-hand-man,
Nicolas Biwott, who sued every
single publisher, reporter,
media person, advertiser, distributor,
editor and bookshop
in their countries as well as at
their source, whenever they
published any form of attempt
in character assassination. In
that way, the aforementioned
were able to keep the foreign
owned and controlled media
and civil society at bay.
Namibia:
In all above context it is interesting
that certain groups
and individuals now claim that
Namibia’s elections were not
free and not fair. They claim
irregularities.
If they cannot proof it, if
they fail to deliver real facts,
the ruling party and government
would be well advised
to lay a counter charge of
disinformation and high treason
with the attempt to undermine
state, government and
country.
In other words, those trying
their hand to muscle their way
into power, and thus perceived
to make use of anything that
is fair in love and war, should
be challenged and hopefully
sued for destabilising the country,
thus posing a threat to national
security.
This would result in serious
charges of treason and high
treason. In other words, they
would be facing charges that
could land them in jail with
seriously hard labour, for a
while at least.
This is no hero-making. The
imperial-international West
would have to answer, why
they would be part of such
“democratic games”, or face
the music.
The last word has not yet
been spoken. Africa’s deceivers
and plunder-barons’ time
will come and then they’ll
have to really invent ways out
of their bluff.