Get Involved
|
Join my SWAPO online community, to share your vision of a better Namibia, participate in discussion forums, and receive regular updates by e-mail.Make your voice heard: Tell the world about your views and suggestions. Write to newspapers, call in to talk shows, share your experiences of the first fifteen years of freedom, and how working together we can do more.
|
|
On SWAPO’S win despite the ‘DEAD OR LIFE’ pronouncement of the RDP
By P.T. Shipale
Indeed, SWAPO has to convince
any would-be defector that there is
no political life outside its ranks and
live up to the benchmark set by
MPLA, ANC and recently
FRELIMO lest former liberation
movements are seen to be losing
ground. The ruling party SWAPO
should also be excited about the 2/3
majority win of Ian Khama’s BDP
in neighboring Botswana, the darling
of the west, which has been in
power for three decades. Botswana
is comparable to Namibia in terms
of ranking and rating in good governance,
constitutional democracy, and
infrastructure development but also
in terms of high unemployment and
HIV prevalence and infection. Despite
the latter, voters were not pigeon
holed nor hoodwinked into
voting for ‘change’ for the sake of
change but instead preferred stability
and continuity. The caveat, however,
is the new trend of ‘dynasty
politics’ in Africa seen in DRC, Togo
and now Botswana. Africans want
peace, stability, continuity and
against that there should be ‘no
change’. Nevertheless, that is not my
topic today as we still have to debunk
and demystify some of the
trends set up in the formation of new
parties before we strategically dissect
their real intentions.
Mr. Jeremiah Nambinga, as the
official spokes-person of RDP, is on
a high dry campaign trail as a cat’s
paw playing second fiddle who
wants to throw dust in our eyes with
nine days wonders. He recently uttered
some dangerous statements
which are contrary to the electoral
law, the code of conduct for political
parties and indeed the supreme
law of this country when he made
reference to “death or life” statements
that are tantamount to inciting
civil strife’s, hooliganism, civil
and tribal war in the country. “To
shout ‘life or death change will come
about’ is a threat to the stability of
Namibia. Who’s death? How can
one bring about change through ‘life
or death’ without shedding blood?”
Asked P. Haindongo in his article in
New Era of the 23rd 0ctober. As
Haindongo, I would also like to find
out if “is it official position of RDP
to shed blood or is Nambinga
operating…without any guidance…?.
Funny enough, and as expected,
the NSHR with its newly trained
cadets and the falsely touted “liberal
media” was conspicuously silent on
those utterances, not to mention the
“clergy” of the ‘eastern Owambo’
alliance, with the exception of men
of god such as Dr.Kapolo, saying a
single word to condemn such utterances.
Surely, some will say that I
am taking things out of context and
blowing his trigger happy criticism
out of proportion but these are the
same people who will cry foul when
the Founding President and the SG
use proverbs and figures of speech,
as sentences of condensed wisdom
offered in place of a whole spate of
words, to summarize life’s general
principles with an illustration. Not
averse to taking the imagery and
poetic language in the proverbs and
figures of speech used to make an
obvious statement to get across a notso-
obvious truth, they resort to misinterpreting
Figurative expressions
such as “a snake in the grass” which
means an enemy who strikes under
cover. The point I am driving at here
is simply to know if the RDP will
distance itself from utterances of
“death or life” pronouncement by
Mr. Jeremia Nambinga.If not,
then we will take it that they declared
war and will be accountable
should anything to that effect
happen during the elections.
POLITICAL BACK-PADDLING;
HOW WILL IT ALL
END?
The editorial of Namibia today
referred to political back-paddling
of Mr. Hidipo when he has “now
cobbled together some opposition
leaders to join him in his bid to
stop Namprint from winning the
tender – the same opposition leaders
whose fears he was instrumental
in allaying when he was a
SWAPO Party leader. Now he is
telling them to believe what he
told them not to believe a few
years ago. How can one trust such
a person?” the editor wanted to
know. This leads me to another
point about ‘academic’ star-studded
temporary success and crafty
compromises of intellectuals
‘who do not need to consult’ to
lead this country.
For quite sometimes, I was pondering
on how to break the news
and carry a message to people
who might have trouble understanding
it. What strategy would
I use? Terry Powell came to my
rescue with his book “Wise up”
when he used a creative approach
to soften the blows of reality. Forget
the few tips on article writing,
the pyramid style of a lead story
and the gist of the article with
catchy headlines etc. what one
needs is a gift even when it comes
with a price of persecution, not
that I am complaining since I accepted
to run with the message,
so to speak (1Corinthian1:1,
Isaiah 6:8, Amos 3:7-8).
A STAR-STUDDED SUCCESS
“A quick glance at Salomon’s
40-year reign shows a public relations
dream come true. His list
of achievements reads like a page
out of “who’s who”. He had the
university/college-level knowledge
of philosophy, literature, architecture,
horticulture, botany,
zoology, geography, and diplomacy.
To top it all off, as a cherry
on the cake, he was wealthier than
any Wall Street financial wizard.
His personal residence was so lavish
that it would make a Beverly
Hills mansion look like an innercity
ghetto project. Before you
start drooling over Salomon’s advantage
though, remember this: he
ran out of gas before reaching the
finish line.” wrote Powell. Does
that ring a bell with our ‘academics’?
Despite “Salomon being the
wisest man, a series of clumsy
situations imprisoned him in his
own “temple of doom”. The irony
is that, when it comes to the tests
posted by life situations, Salomon
couldn’t make the grade.” continued
Powell. The question is: what
accounted for Salomon’s political
savvy and bulging bank account?
After all, it was still front-page
news when he begged for wisdom
to fulfill his job description? The
answer to that is simple; “He became
intoxicated by too many
gulps of worldly pleasure. He
started living life according to his
own script. His disobedience diluted
his character through a crafty
compromise.” Powell wrote.
Does that ring a bell again or not
yet? Let us look at crafty compromise
to see if now it does.
CRAFTY COMPROMISE
The dictionary defines compromise
as: “to make a shameful or
disreputable concession”. It’s
making a choice base on personal
rewards at the expense of ethical
conviction. “Compromise reveals
termites in the timber character of
Salomon; he had the kind of
fence-straddling faith. He feared
the opinion of men more than the
consequence of sin. He feared to
heed the advice he had given others.
Almost three thousand years
have passed, yet fickle fidelity is
still as common as a sore throat in
January. Like Salomon, too many
of us try to serve the Lord without
offending the devil and we end
up wavering and compromising.
Why it is so? The answer lays in
the craving for more. In one word,
greed which injects the poison of
a “more” mentality into our bloodstream
of gifts and when greed
reigns, our consciousness goes
into rigor mortis.” Reiterated
Powell.
Here is an example of an uncontrolled
appetite leading to a
tragic conclusion: This is a story
of how an Eskimo kills a wolf.
The account is grisly, yet it offers
fresh insight into the consuming,
self-destructive nature of greed as
told by Paul Harvey: “First the
Eskimo coats his knife blade with
animal blood and allows it to
freeze. Then he adds another layer
of blood, and another, until the
blade is completely concealed by
frozen blood. Next, the hunter
fixes his knife in the ground with
the blade up. When a wolf follows
his sensitive nose to the source of
scent and discovers the blade and
licks it, tasting the fresh-frozen
blood, he begins to lick faster
more and more vigorously, lapping
the blade until the keen edge
is bare. Feverishly now, harder the
wolf licks the blade in the Arctic
night. So great becomes his craving
for blood that the wolf does
not notice the razor sharp sting of
the naked blade on his tongue nor
does he recognize the instant at
which his insatiable thirst is being
satisfied by his own warm
blood. His carnivorous appetite
just craves for more.”
Looking back on his lavish
lifestyle, the sharp blade of regrets
slashed Salomon’s conscience.
Did all his lucrative investments
satisfy his soul? Just the opposite.
He concluded; “everything was
meaningless, a chasing after the
wind; nothing was gained under
the sun”. Indeed, a hollow human
heart bleeds more than a wolf’s
carcass lying in the Arctic snow.”
concluded Powell. This is the tragic
end of greed and anything that is
not inspired by the spirit leads to
the fruits of the flesh, which is a
corrupted way of thinking manifested
in jealousy, hatred, revenge,
greed and all other evils. If this is a
‘new vision’ I wouldn’t want to be
part of such a vision of bloodshed,
retaliation, revenge, midnight-fly
or fly-by-night owl style and calling
others derogatory names such
as ‘haihambos, kwankaras,
ovanailongo, omusati clique,
mbwitis’ etc.
By P.T. Shipale
|