Hidipo in hot water
By Asser Ntinda
SWAPO Party has instituted a
N$100 million legal action
against the President of the Rally
for Democracy and Progress,
RDP, Hidipo Hamutenya, over
allegations he made at the beginning
of this month at Okongo in
Ohangwena Region.
SWAPO Party is demanding
N$100 million in damages over
allegations made by Hamutenya in
which he said SWAPO Party had
been “cheating and rigging elections”
all those years.
Addressing an RDP rally at
Okongo, Hamutenya claimed that
the SWAPO Party had been
“cheating to win elections all these
years,” particularly “during the
movement of ballot boxes from
voting venues to centrally located
counting points was one of the
loopholes” the SWAPO Party had
been “using to cheat the elections
in order to win all those years.”
New Era, which published the
story quoted Hamutenya as saying
that it was through the “movement
of ballot boxes” that the ruling
parties in the SADC Region
had the chance to exchange genuine
ballot boxes with false ones.
In the combined summons issued
this week against RDP as first
respondent and against
Hamutenya as second respondent,
SWAPO Party said that the statements
by Hamutenya were wrongful
and defamatory in that they
were intended and were reasonably
understood by readers and
those who were able to observe and
listen to those allegations to defame
SWAPO Party.
SWAPO Party said that
Hamutenya’s statements meant that SWAPO Party had been conspiring
with the Electoral Commission
of Namibia, ECN, and
was involved in “election fraud”
against the people of Namibia.
By making those statements,
Hamutenya meant that SWAPO
Party was “involved in corrupt and
dishonest activities; that it engages
in subversive activities, it acts in
total disregard for and infringes the
Constitutional principles of the
Republic of Namibia, that it conducts
itself in an irregular and improper
manner, engages in illegal
activities which are not sanctioned
by the laws of the Republic of
Namibia, engages in activities
which undermine the Government
of the Republic of Namibia, and
that SWAPO undermines the principles
of democracy and the democratic
processes in and of the Republic
of Namibia.”
The summons, issued by
Conradie & Damaseb Legal Practitioners,
said such allegations were
uttered and published by
Hamutenya and RDP with the intention
to defame SWAPO Party
and injure its good name and reputation
and with the further intention
to cause wide and further publication
of such statements concerning
SWAPO Party.
As a result of Hamutenya’s allegations
and their subsequent dissemination
and extensive publication,
SWAPO Party has suffered
loss in the sum of N$100 million.
RDP and its President should
therefore pay SWAPO Party that
amount with interest from the date
of judgment to the date of payment.
RDP and Hamutenya should
also pay SWAPO Party’s legal
costs. They have 10 days upon receipt
of the summons to show
whether they will defend the case,
and 20 days to file and serve notice
of intention to defend the matter.
Hamutenya’s allegations were
widely condemned by both the
government and SWAPO Party.
Shortly after the allegations were
made, SWAPO Party Secretary
General, Cde Pendukeni Iivula-
Ithana, issued a strongly worded
statement refuting Hamutenya’s
claims.
She challenged Hamutenya to
come out with concrete evidence
of the cheating, adding that if he
had been aware of such cheating,
he should have reported those
things to law enforcement agencies.
“The gravity of these allegations
is so serious that they cannot remain
unchallenged by any soberminded
democratic person,” said
Cde Iivula-Ithana. “No self-respecting
person could make such unfounded allegations unless he or
she is under the influence of something
best known to him or herself.
“I have been in the leadership of
SWAPO Party before and after independence
and have attended
most meetings where policy decisions
were taken, but at no time
have I participated, witnessed or
heard plans of the topic of cheating
appearing on any agenda of the
SWAPO Party.
“The nature of cheating we do
not know, hence Mr Hamutenya
needs to provide irrefutable proof
beyond any reasonable doubt of his
alleged cheating. If he fails to do
so, then the law enforcement agencies
must call him in order to give
sworn statement before them.
“Failure to do so, SWAPO Party
reserves its right to seek redress
before the Court of Law in this
specific instance.”